In some cases, symbols that do not symbolize "one felt meaning" facilitate understanding (v1)
from Study Session 1 on "Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning
In some cases, symbols that are not symbols of "one felt meaning" facilitate understanding
However, there are cases where symbols that are not symbolic of that "one felt meaning" promote understanding
nishio.iconSo here's what I mean.
https://gyazo.com/1c558545432dc5fcd3bed27bc1fbe993
SR does not symbolize Fx, but helps Fx symbolize into Sx
This is "RELEVANCE."
nishio.iconI thought that this "understanding" uses UNDERSTAND, which is different from the COMPREHENSION translation of "understanding"...
Relevance is "that kind of related felt meaning whereby the symbolization is thereby made intelligible."
relevant felt meanings, from out of which symbolization is understandable
Here's what they say in everyday conversation
To understand, we need "past experience".
" context" must be understood
nishio.iconThis is different from COMPREHENSION.
What does UNDERSTAND mean here?
A set of symbols comes to be understood with the help of many other experienced meanings, not just the one felt meaning they represent (p. 158).
This "understanding" is UNDERSTOOD
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「一つの感じられた意味」をシンボル化したものではないシンボルが理解を促すケースがある(v1). If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.